Welcome to LVS Rich Publishing!
(02) 8579-9170 | Buy Guide

Tag - abandonment

27 Jan

No Abandonment and No Constructive Dismissal Result in Reinstatement without Backwages

It is well settled that abandonment of work cannot be simply presumed from the occurrence of certain equivocal acts. In proving abandonment, this the Supreme Court (SC) held in Hubilla vs. HSY Marketing Ltd., Co. (823 Phil. 358, 385 (2018) that there must be a positive and overt act signifying an employee’s deliberate intent to sever his or her employment. Thus, mere absence from work, even after a notice to return, is insufficient to prove abandonment. The employer must show that [...]

By Labor Law , , , , , , , , 0 Comments Read more...
01 Jun

Claim of Abandonment vs Claim of Illegal Dismissal

Contrasting allegations may be presented in court involving employee who claims to have been verbally dismissed from service and employer who denies having done so and instead alleges that the employee abandoned his job. If so, how it should be resolved? In the August 2013 case of MZR Industries vs. Colambot, the Supreme Court held, in sum: The Court recognized the rule that in illegal dis- missal cases, the employer bears the burden of proving that the termination was for a valid [...]

By Labor Law , , , , , , , , , 0 Comments Read more...
29 May

Abandonment Requires Notice

Abandonment is a ground for dismissal of employees under Article 297 of the Labor Code, as amended. Being considered as within the context of gross and habitual neglect of duty. However, while abandoning employee is usually not physically available, he should still be served the notices for the dismissal. There is no such thing automatic termination for abandonment. An employee whom the employer deems to have abandoned his work cannot be automatically terminated. Due process is required in order for the [...]

By Labor Law , , , , , , , , , , , 0 Comments Read more...
26 May

Filing of Illegal Dismissal as Against Denial of Termination in Abandonment Cases

Substantial evidence proffered by the employer that it had not terminated the employee should not be ignored on the pretext that the employee would not have filed the complaint for illegal dismissal if he had not really been dismissed. The Court held that such non sequitur reasoning cannot take the place of the evidence of both The lapse of time between the dismissal of an employee for abandonment and the filing of a complaint for illegal dismissal is not a [...]

By Labor Law , , , , , , , , 0 Comments Read more...
23 May

Evidence Required in Abandonment Cases

Abandonment of work is a ground for dismissal under Article 297 of the Labor Code, as amended. However, is mere claim of abandonment already substantial evidence to support the dismissal? The issue of whether the employee has abandoned his work is factual. The law does not enumerate what specific overt acts can be considered as strong evidence of the intention to sever the employer-employee relationship. Failure of the employer to present attendance record even when this was readily available to it could [...]

By Labor Law , , , , , , , , , 0 Comments Read more...
error: Content is protected !!